top of page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
Web health & wellness - 2025-03-23T113617.860.png

BPA-Free... But Is It Really Safe?

Many “BPA-free” products use BPS instead—a chemical that may be just as harmful. Research shows BPS can disrupt hormones, mimic estrogen, and trigger oxidative stress—raising the same health concerns as BPA.   BPA-free” doesn’t always mean risk-free.

This Is a Title

Bisphenol S (BPS) is a chemical often used to replace Bisphenol A (BPA) in “BPA-free” products (such as certain plastics and thermal receipt paper)​Toxicfreefuture.org. However, “BPA-free” doesn’t necessarily mean safe – growing evidence shows that BPS can pose many of the same health risks as BPA​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Below we summarize key findings on BPS’s potential health risks, including its endocrine (hormone) disruption, estrogen-mimicking effects, oxidative stress, and metabolic concerns, and why BPS may not be a safer alternative to BPA.

Endocrine Disruption & Estrogenic Effects

BPS is now recognized as an endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC), much like BPA. In other words, it can interfere with our hormone systems – particularly by mimicking or altering estrogen, a primary sex hormone. Research indicates that BPS’s hormonal activity is on the same order of magnitude as BPA’s, meaning it can bind to hormone receptors and trigger similar biological responses​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Here are some key findings on BPS’s estrogen-like behavior:

​

  • Mimicking Hormones: Studies have found BPS to be as hormonally active as BPA, with similar estrogenic (and even anti-estrogenic or anti-androgenic) actions in cells and animals​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Simply put, BPS can bind to estrogen receptors much like BPA does, disrupting normal hormone signals.

    ​

  • Altering Cell Behavior: BPS can disrupt the actions of estradiol (the body’s natural estrogen) at the cell level. For example, one study showed BPS (once touted as a safe substitute) interfered with estrogen-driven cell signaling, altering cell growth and even prompting cell death in a lab model​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. This kind of disruption underscores that BPS actively meddles with hormone-regulated cell functions.

  • Estrogen-Like Activity: In tests on breast cancer cells, BPS displayed clear estrogen-like behavior, stimulating cells in a way similar to estrogen itself​ endocrinenews.endocrine.org. This finding is telling – it suggests BPS is not a benign BPA replacement, since it can activate estrogen-sensitive pathways in cells​endocrinenews.endocrine.org.

 

Why this matters: Hormones regulate critical processes like growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction. A chemical like BPS that mimics or blocks hormones can lead to imbalances or improper signals. The estrogenic effects of BPS raise concerns that it could influence estrogen-responsive tissues (such as breast tissue or reproductive organs) and contribute to hormone-related health issues, just as BPA is known to do.

Oxidative Stress and Cellular Damage

Another way BPS may affect health is through oxidative stress. Oxidative stress occurs when there’s an imbalance between damaging free radicals and the body’s antioxidants, often leading to cellular damage and inflammation. Emerging research links BPS exposure to increased oxidative stress in cells and tissues. In fact, scientific reviews note that BPS (and similar BPA alternatives) can disturb the body’s antioxidant defenses and induce oxidative stress​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

​

  • Free Radical Damage: Laboratory studies have observed that BPS exposure leads to higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and changes in antioxidant enzyme activity​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In simple terms, BPS can tip the balance toward a more pro-oxidant state, which can damage cell components like DNA, proteins, and cell membranes.

  • Inflammation and Tissue Effects: By promoting oxidative stress, BPS may also trigger inflammatory responses​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. For example, research in cell cultures shows that oxidative stress from BPS can harm cells; and animal studies have found BPS-induced oxidative damage in organs. (In one study on mice, BPS caused oxidative stress in the testes, leading to sperm cell apoptosis – highlighting how this stress can translate into functional damage​

    analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com.)

 

Chronic oxidative stress is a known contributor to aging and diseases (including heart disease, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer). The fact that BPS can elevate oxidative stress suggests that prolonged or high exposure might contribute to such health problems. While more research is ongoing, these findings further question the “safety” of BPS in consumer products.

Metabolic Concerns (Obesity and Diabetes)

Perhaps most worrying for a health-conscious audience, BPS has been implicated in metabolic disorders. Just like BPA, BPS is being examined as a potential obesogen – a chemical that promotes weight gain and fat accumulation. Key studies have associated BPS exposure with increased risk of obesity and insulin resistance (a precursor to diabetes). Notably, some findings even suggest BPS might worsen certain metabolic outcomes compared to BPA:

​

  • Weight Gain and Fat Cells: Experimental research indicates that BPS exposure can lead to the development of larger and more numerous fat cells, as well as increased fat storage in the body. One review noted that BPS may promote obesogenic (weight-gain) effects that are worse than those of BPA​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In other words, in some models BPS caused even greater fat accumulation or weight gain tendencies than BPA did – an unexpected and alarming result​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

  • Obesity in Population Studies: Epidemiological studies (which look at humans) have found links between BPS levels and obesity. BPS has been detected in urine samples of people, and higher BPS exposure correlates with a greater likelihood of general and abdominal obesity in some populations​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. This suggests that people with more BPS in their bodies tended to have higher body weight or body fat, though causation is still being studied.

  • Insulin Resistance and Diabetes Risk: There is also evidence connecting BPS to blood sugar regulation problems. Research summaries conclude that exposure to BPS (or its cousin BPF) may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. BPS might impair how cells respond to insulin, much like BPA is known to do, thereby promoting insulin resistance and raising blood glucose – key factors in diabetes onset. In fact, several animal studies show BPS disrupts glucose metabolism and lipid (fat) metabolism, echoing the metabolic disturbances seen with BPA.

    ​

These metabolic concerns are critical. If BPS is indeed contributing to weight gain and diabetes risk, it means that “BPA-free” products could still be fostering the very health issues consumers are trying to avoid. Given the global rise in obesity and diabetes, understanding and minimizing any chemical contributors is very important.

BPS vs. BPA: Not a “Safer” Alternative

When BPA became infamous for its health risks, manufacturers turned to BPS hoping for a safer alternative. Unfortunately, BPS appears to mirror BPA’s harmful effects in many respects, calling into question the true benefit of BPA-free labels when BPS is used. Here’s how BPS compares to BPA based on current findings:

  • Similar Hormone Disruption: BPS and BPA share a very similar chemical structure, which may explain why BPS disrupts hormones almost as effectively as BPA does​pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Scientists have concluded that BPS is “as hormonally active as BPA,” exhibiting estrogenic and androgenic effects in lab studies just like BPA​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. This means that swapping BPA for BPS doesn’t avoid hormone-related dangers – it simply introduces another chemical that can unbalance hormones.

  • Estrogenic Potency: Far from being inert, BPS can engage estrogen receptors in the body. Lab tests of estrogen-sensitive cells show BPS acts like estrogen, paralleling BPA’s mode of action​endocrinenews.endocrine.org. Some bisphenol substitutes were even found to be more potent than BPA in certain estrogenic effects​toxicfreefuture.org. While BPS was initially assumed to be safer, these estrogenic behaviors underscore that it can trigger many of the same biological responses as BPA.

  • Cellular and Metabolic Effects: Both BPA and BPS can induce oxidative stress and inflammation in living systems, which are underlying factors for various diseases​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Both have been linked to metabolic problems: for instance, both chemicals are associated with weight gain and insulin resistance in animal and human studies​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. BPS’s ability to drive these effects equal to BPA (and sometimes more so) means it carries comparable risk in terms of chronic health issues.

  • Regulatory and Expert Concerns: Health experts and regulators are increasingly wary of BPA replacements like BPS. Notably, endocrine scientists point out that BPS’s estrogen-like activity “suggests that it may not be a safer BPA alternative” despite its widespread use​ endocrinenews.endocrine.org. Some jurisdictions have even flagged BPS alongside BPA as chemicals of concern, recognizing that simply being “BPA-free” doesn’t guarantee a product is free from endocrine disruptors.

This Is a Title

Bottom line: BPS was introduced into consumer products to offer a BPA-free option, but scientific evidence is accumulating that BPS is not a significantly safer alternative. It disrupts hormones in similar ways to BPA, has estrogenic effects on cells, can cause oxidative stress, and is linked to obesity and diabetes risk – all of which are the very problems BPA was criticized for. In light of these findings, health-conscious consumers and researchers alike are cautioning that a “BPA-free” label is misleading if the replacement (like BPS) is another harmful bisphenol.

​

In summary, if you’re avoiding BPA for health reasons, it’s wise to be equally cautious about BPS. The key takeaway from current research is that BPS can pose many of the same endocrine and metabolic dangers as BPA​ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, undermining its credibility as a safe substitute. Ongoing studies continue to investigate BPS, but the consensus so far is clear: when it comes to hormone disruption and long-term health risks, BPS is no better than BPA​ endocrinenews.endocrine.org   pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​. It serves as a reminder that “BPA-free” doesn’t automatically mean “healthy” or “chemical-free” – the actual chemicals used in place of BPA matter greatly for our health. Always stay informed about such alternatives, and support efforts to find truly safe materials for our food containers, bottles, and other everyday products.

​

This Is a Title

Edit this paragraph to add any content you would iike to share about your company or service.

bottom of page